Avian reovirus (ARV) is associated with arthritis/tenosynovitis and malabsorption syndrome in chickens. The σC and σB proteins, both exposed to the virus capsid, are highly immunogenic and could form the basis for diagnostic devices designed to assess the immunological status of the flock. Commercial ARV ELISAs cannot distinguish between vaccinated and infected animals and might not detect circulating ARV strains. We aimed to develop a customized test to detect the circulating field ARV strains as well as distinguish between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals. We developed ELISA assays based on recombinant (r) σB, σC and the nonstructural protein σNS and tested them using antisera of vaccinated and unvacc... More
Avian reovirus (ARV) is associated with arthritis/tenosynovitis and malabsorption syndrome in chickens. The σC and σB proteins, both exposed to the virus capsid, are highly immunogenic and could form the basis for diagnostic devices designed to assess the immunological status of the flock. Commercial ARV ELISAs cannot distinguish between vaccinated and infected animals and might not detect circulating ARV strains. We aimed to develop a customized test to detect the circulating field ARV strains as well as distinguish between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals. We developed ELISA assays based on recombinant (r) σB, σC and the nonstructural protein σNS and tested them using antisera of vaccinated and unvaccinated chickens as well as negative controls. Fragments of σB and σC proteins were also used to study regions that could be further exploited in diagnostic tests. Vaccinated and unvaccinated birds were positive by commercial ELISA, with no difference in optical density values. In contrast, samples of unvaccinated animals showed lower absorbance in the rσB and rσC ELISA tests and higher absorbance in the rσNS ELISA test than the vaccinated animals. Negative control samples were negative in all tests. Fragmentation of σB and σC proteins showed that some regions can differentiate between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals. For example, σB amino acids 128-179 (σB-F4) and σC amino acids 121-165 (σC-F4) exhibited 85 and 95% positivity among samples of vaccinated animals but only 5% and zero positivity among samples of unvaccinated animals, respectively. These data suggest that unvaccinated birds might have been exposed to field strains of ARV. The reduction in absorbance in the recombinant tests possibly reflects an increased specificity of our test since unvaccinated samples showed less cross-reactivity with the vaccine proteins immobilized on ELISAs. The discrepant results obtained with the protein fragment tests between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals are discussed in light of the diversity between ARV strains.
